Leak vs Hack

The following was derived from the following sources: The Nation, The Senate, Politico, The NYT, The New Yorker, ITV, The House, DC, The CTH, Crowdstrike, CNN, Bloomberg, and The Beast.

Date      Description

5/19/2015          DOJ official Peter Kadzik, writing from personal email account, emails John Podesta to warn of House probe into Clinton’s emails

4/30/2016          DNC IT staff reports suspected hacking on its server(s) to FBI, but fails to turn over the server to the agency, instead hires Crowdstrike

5/15/2016          Crowdstrike claims it investigated DNC hacking and that Russians were responsible; FBI still denied access to server to confirm

6/4/2016            Ellen Nakashima of the Washington Post reports, via anonymous sources, that Russians hacked the DNC

6/12/2016          Wikileaks’ Assange warns that Clinton emails will be leaked

6/15/2016          Romanian hacker “Guccifer” claims to have hacked DNC; analysis indicates faux “Russian” fingerprints were inserted into some files

7/5/2016            Romanian hacker “Guccifer” claims to have hacked DNC again (“Guccifer 2.0”)

7/5/2016            Date that forensics indicate that DNC emails were copied by an insider via USB and not hacked via external actors

7/10/2016          DNC staffer Seth Rich murdered in as yet unsolved case

7/24/2016          Clinton aide Robbie Mook claims Russians hacked DNC and Clinton campaign to aid Trump

7/25/2016          FBI announces it will investigate the DNC hack revealed by Wikileaks, Peter Strzok handpicked to lead investigation

7/25/2016          Wikileaks’ Assange says he timed release of DNC emails to impact convention; says “no one” knows who provided emails

7/26/2016          Fusion GPS contractor Steele files new “Dossier” memo stating Russians hacked DNC (two days after Robbie Mook stated the same)

8/30/2016          House Democrats write FBI Director Comey asking him to investigate Trump-Russia collusion in context of DNC hacking

9/14/2016          CIA operative Stefan Halper meets with Papadopoulos, asking “you know about hacking the emails from Russia, right?”

9/22/2016          Sen. Feinstein (D-CA) and Rep. Schiff (D-CA) issue joint statement decrying Russian “hacking”

10/7/2016          Wikileaks releases archive of emails stolen from Clinton operative John Podesta

12/9/2016          CIA tells Congress that they believe the Russians hacked the DNC to help defeat Hillary Clinton’s campaign

12/14/2016        Citing unnamed intelligence officials (likely Strzok or Page), Washington Post reports on “Russian election hacking”

1/2/2017            Wikileaks’ Assange says he guarantees emails did not come from Russia; that Obama administration is trying to undermine Trump

1/11/2017          John Podesta meets with Fusion GPS founder Simpson; but later tells Senate Intelligence Committee he has no knowledge of “dossier”

2/15/2017          McCabe tells Reince Priebus that FBI sees no evidence of Russian “collusion”, but he and Comey refuse to publicly state

6/15/2017          Former DHS head Jeh Johnson tells Congress that the DNC refused to turn over its server so it could throughly investigate “hack”

7/24/2017          Consortium of Intelligence Professionals (VIPS) reports that there is no evidence that Russians hacked DNC (see 7/5/16)

8/9/2017            The Nation reports evidence that DNC insiders, not Russian hackers, compromised Democrat IT systems

1/19/2018          NBC’s Dilanian, with a history of ties to Fusion GPS, markets false claim that Russian “bots” are behind #ReleaseTheMemo hashtag

4/20/2018          DNC files civil lawsuit against Russia, the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks for “collusion”; opens up many Democrats to discovery

7/13/2018          SC Mueller relases indictment of 12 Russian GRU agents for allegedly attempting to hack DNC

7/15/2018          Devin Nunes reveals latest Mueller indictment was simply rehashed material from House IC Report and omitted hacks of GOP parties

7/19/2018          Tony Podesta reported to have received use immunity by Special Counsel Mueller to testify against Manafort

7/31/2018          Special Counsel Mueller reported to have referred Tony Podesta and other lobbyists to Manhattan attorneys for prosecution

4/18/2019          AG Barr releases Mueller report finding no collusion and no obstruction. Report omits genesis of probe (“Dossier”), Fusion GPS collusions with Steele, etc.

Cliff Notes Version:

The entire Russian Collusion narrative was contrived in order to hide the fact that Seth Rich provided the DNC emails via a thumb drive to Wikileaks. The “fake news” that Guccifer (The Russians) performed the “Hack” was immediately disproven, then immediately resurfaced as Guccifer 2.0. Unfortunately for the perpetrators, Bill Binney proved the emails were downloaded locally due to their transfer speeds.

**A Leak – Not a Hack**

And if you’ve read to this point, might you notice that Wikileaks in May of 2015 was aware of communications to John Podesta via email. This is almost a year prior to the DNC claims of being potentially hacked. Could it be that Assange has more information not yet released?

Advertisement

Climate Change

Initiation of the Climate Change Narrative from the originator’s perspective

Maurice Strong was credited for organizing the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, which led to what is now called the IPCC, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Maurice, a Canadian who ran away from home at 14, got his first exposure to the UN in 1947 at the age of 18 as an assistant pass officer in the Identification Unit of the Security Section. Living at the time with the Treasurer of the UN, he first met David Rockefeller and learned that the UN’s funds were handled by Rockefeller’s Chase Bank.

He became an investment analyst at 19,  and VP of Dome Petroleum at 25. After being taken into the fold of Pierre Trudeau, he became president of Power Corporation at 31, and ran the corporation at the age of 35.       

             Maurice was a lifelong socialist who saw the potential of using an environmental movement to fight capitalism and introduce a system of “global governance” that would coordinate all human activity.

IPCC compartmentalizing between the “data” and the “mitigation”

               The IPCC is broken down into 3 Working Groups. “The IPCC Working Group I (WGI) examines the physical science underpinning past, present, and future climate change.” The WGI in other words, controls the data going into the whole process.

             “Working Group II Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability”

             “Working Group III Mitigation of Climate Change”

             It is not within the framework of WGII or WGIII to in any way evaluate the data provided to them. They are simply tasked with, given the data, what can be done to adapt and mitigate the impact that the data forecasts.

Temperature Measurement accuracy on a global basis

           To assign a temperature to the planet at any given time within any minute degree of accuracy is relatively impossible. Even NASA states that when measuring Surface Air Temperature (SAT), “there is no universally accepted correct answer.”

             If instead, we start to look higher up into the atmosphere for temperature readings, an estimate of the temperature variation from sea level to the top of Mt. Everest would be more than 40 degrees.

             And below is a map showing the location of the world’s weather stations as well as where there are no weather station readings as well.

             According to data from “a total of fifteen instruments flying on different satellites” over the years, March 2019 increase in temperature was reported to be up .34 Deg. C. If you go to the NASA/ Goddard Institute website, the current increase is .8 Deg C. Although they say this represents the “global surface temperature”, the actual graph says the data represents “GLOBAL LAND-OCEAN TEMPERATURE INDEX”.

             I reference the statement above, Even NASA states that when measuring Surface Air Temperature (SAT), “there is no universally accepted correct answer.”

Manipulation of data

           As the data that is generated to create the forecasting models is at the heart of any concerns about accuracy, below are two versions of the same data from NASA between 1999 and 2016.

h

Inaccurate Forecasting and predictions

           Forecasting the climate over the last many decades has been a popular topic within the media. Many articles in the sixties and seventies predicted a mini-ice age. The beginning of the Global Warming predictions started June 23^rd, 1988 officially when James Hansen told Congress that Global Warming was not approaching, it was here.

             James Hansen’s testimony was sponsored by Senator Timothy Wirth, a democratic senator who later went on to work with Al Gore in supporting the Kyoto Protocol. Wirth announced the U.S.’s commitment to legally binding limits on greenhouse gas emissions.

             In 2008, Hansen predicted, echoing other scientists that the Arctic would be free of ice in the summer within 5 to 10 years. Below is a graph of the Arctic Sea Ice during the last 4 years on a monthly basis. There is still ice in the Arctic in the summer months.

How much money do “They” hope to get from a carbon tax?

In 2016, More than $28.3 billion in government “carbon revenues” were collected each year in 40 countries and another 16 states or provinces around the world.

             In 2017, the US pulled out of the Paris Climate Accord.

A Perspective on Mainstream Media

For years every morning the mainstream media were fed the daily talking points from the “3 letter agencies” that formed the basis of “facts” (or more so, the daily narrative) within the US.

Upon the election of Trump, the “propaganda” began to diminish, except for the “hail mary” Russian collusion narrative. After all, who in the US isn’t up for a little Russian propaganda?

Now that the Russian collusion narrative is gone, and the “3 letter agencies” are even further from influencing the narrative, the MSM is in a pickle.

The “adults in the room” are faced with having to (perhaps) tell the truth, and face losing their jobs. As these adults wander into the reality of the real world they uncover stories about Joe Biden. None of the Joe Biden stories are interesting to anyone paying attention over the last decade or so. Not only are the “Creepy” stories well known, but his son’s entrenchment in Ukraine’s oil business is common knowledge.

The powers wanting to control the world, who are actively censoring all that is true, will continue to do so. Those few “adults in the room” that have wandered from the narrative within MSM will either be fading from view, or boot stepping into line. Where they source their “news” from will become increasingly dangerous to their controllers as the “fake” news is more than obvious. If they attempt to dabble in the “truth” much more, they risk exposing it all.

Expect an even more outrageous perspective from MSM as they attempt to secure their position. After all, the MSM has been awarded the 2019 First Amendment Awards, for… “holding the powerful to account, shining a light on corruption, acting as a catalyst for positive change in local communities without denial of access, undue restriction, or fear of attack.”

As this week, Tommy Robinson and Natural News are the latest to be de-personed by Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube.